PCAL.World

Exhibits

***

Print this page

***

Peeling the onion, one layer at a time …

***

***

*The underlined documents are links that can be clicked in order to open and view the document being referenced.

***

  1. Exhibit: 2026-05-25: May 25, 2026: God’s Ten Commandments From God’s Holy Bible New International Version
  2. Exhibit: 1995-05-08: May 8, 1995 (or thereabout): Minnesota Champlin Police Report
    • Christopher Jonathan Mundt “assaulted a victim in the third degree.”
    • Christopher Jonathan Mundt “kicked victim in the face”
    • Relevance:
      • Mens rea: Mens rea is the “guilty mind” or mental state required for criminal liability, reflecting the defendant’s intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence when committing a crime.
      • Premeditation: The action of planning something (especially a crime) beforehand.
      • Motive: Explaining why an individual might have committed a particular act.
      • Opportunity: Indicating that a person had the means or access to commit the act in question. This focuses on the practical ability rather than a character trait.
      • Intent: Showing that an action was not accidental or mistaken. If a person repeatedly engages in similar fraudulent schemes, this pattern can demonstrate a deliberate intent in the current alleged fraud.
      • Preparation, Plan, and Premeditation: Where prior conduct reveals a larger scheme or a specific method leading up to the act.
      • Knowledge: Indicating that a person was aware of certain facts or conditions relevant to the current situation. For example, prior experience with a dangerous substance could show knowledge of its risks.
      • Identity: If past acts reveal a unique “signature” or modus operandi that links a person to the current event.
      • Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident: Particularly in cases where a defense claims an unintentional act.
    • 1995-05-08 Minnesota Champlin Police Report – CJM – assault in third degree – victim kicked in the face.pdf
  3. Exhibit: 2016-07-05: July 5, 2016: Christopher Jonathan Mundt – Credit Card Statement Showing A Purchase For Adult Friend Finder
  4. Exhibit: 2016-12-13: December 13, 2016: 2016-12-13 Gmail – Consultation Meeting – James Evans
  5. Exhibit: 2017-01-01: January 1, 2017 (or thereabout): Williamson County Sheriff’s Office Letter to Donika Pentcheva – Redacted
  6. Exhibit: 2017-04-28 :April 28, 2017: Marriage Certificate between Daniela Georgieva Ivanova and Christopher Jonathan Mundt in the State of Minnesota
    • Relevance:
      • Mens rea: Mens rea is the “guilty mind” or mental state required for criminal liability, reflecting the defendant’s intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence when committing a crime.
      • Premeditation: The action of planning something (especially a crime) beforehand.
      • Motive: Explaining why an individual might have committed a particular act.
      • Opportunity: Indicating that a person had the means or access to commit the act in question. This focuses on the practical ability rather than a character trait.
      • Intent: Showing that an action was not accidental or mistaken. If a person repeatedly engages in similar fraudulent schemes, this pattern can demonstrate a deliberate intent in the current alleged fraud.
      • Preparation, Plan, and Premeditation: Where prior conduct reveals a larger scheme or a specific method leading up to the act.
      • Knowledge: Indicating that a person was aware of certain facts or conditions relevant to the current situation. For example, prior experience with a dangerous substance could show knowledge of its risks.
      • Identity: If past acts reveal a unique “signature” or modus operandi that links a person to the current event.
      • Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident: Particularly in cases where a defense claims an unintentional act.
    • 2017-04-28 Marriage Certificate between Daniela Georgieva Ivanova and Christopher Jonathan Mundt in the State of Minnesota.pdf
  7. Exhibit: 2017-10-02:October 2, 2017: Affidavit of Christopher Mundt
    • Relevance:
      • Mens rea: Mens rea is the “guilty mind” or mental state required for criminal liability, reflecting the defendant’s intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence when committing a crime.
      • Premeditation: The action of planning something (especially a crime) beforehand.
      • Motive: Explaining why an individual might have committed a particular act.
      • Opportunity: Indicating that a person had the means or access to commit the act in question. This focuses on the practical ability rather than a character trait.
      • Intent: Showing that an action was not accidental or mistaken. If a person repeatedly engages in similar fraudulent schemes, this pattern can demonstrate a deliberate intent in the current alleged fraud.
      • Preparation, Plan, and Premeditation: Where prior conduct reveals a larger scheme or a specific method leading up to the act.
      • Knowledge: Indicating that a person was aware of certain facts or conditions relevant to the current situation. For example, prior experience with a dangerous substance could show knowledge of its risks.
      • Identity: If past acts reveal a unique “signature” or modus operandi that links a person to the current event.
      • Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident: Particularly in cases where a defense claims an unintentional act.
    • 2017-10-02 Affidavit of Christopher Mundt – Redacted.pdf
  8. Exhibit: 2017-10-02: October 2, 2017: Affidavit of Daniela Ivanova
    • Relevance:
      • Mens rea: Mens rea is the “guilty mind” or mental state required for criminal liability, reflecting the defendant’s intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence when committing a crime.
      • Premeditation: The action of planning something (especially a crime) beforehand.
      • Motive: Explaining why an individual might have committed a particular act.
      • Opportunity: Indicating that a person had the means or access to commit the act in question. This focuses on the practical ability rather than a character trait.
      • Intent: Showing that an action was not accidental or mistaken. If a person repeatedly engages in similar fraudulent schemes, this pattern can demonstrate a deliberate intent in the current alleged fraud.
      • Preparation, Plan, and Premeditation: Where prior conduct reveals a larger scheme or a specific method leading up to the act.
      • Knowledge: Indicating that a person was aware of certain facts or conditions relevant to the current situation. For example, prior experience with a dangerous substance could show knowledge of its risks.
      • Identity: If past acts reveal a unique “signature” or modus operandi that links a person to the current event.
      • Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident: Particularly in cases where a defense claims an unintentional act.
    • 2017-10-02 Affidavit of Daniela Ivanova – Redacted.pdf
  9. Exhibit: 2017-11-21: November 21, 2017: Order, dated November 21, 2017, in Minnesota Anoka County District Court Case Number 02-FA-17-1191 – Redacted
    • Daniela Georgieva Ivanova was adjudicated “less than truthful to this court.” Paragraph 28 on page 5 of Order, dated November 21, 2017, in Minnesota Anoka County District Court Case Number 02-FA-17-1191 – Redacted.
    • Daniela Georgieva Ivanova’s affidavits were adjudicated to be “riddled with inconsistencies.” Paragraph 28 on page 5 of Order, dated November 21, 2017, in Minnesota Anoka County District Court Case Number 02-FA-17-1191 – Redacted.
    • Relevance:
      • Mens rea: Mens rea is the “guilty mind” or mental state required for criminal liability, reflecting the defendant’s intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence when committing a crime.
      • Premeditation: The action of planning something (especially a crime) beforehand.
      • Motive: Explaining why an individual might have committed a particular act.
      • Opportunity: Indicating that a person had the means or access to commit the act in question. This focuses on the practical ability rather than a character trait.
      • Intent: Showing that an action was not accidental or mistaken. If a person repeatedly engages in similar fraudulent schemes, this pattern can demonstrate a deliberate intent in the current alleged fraud.
      • Preparation, Plan, and Premeditation: Where prior conduct reveals a larger scheme or a specific method leading up to the act.
      • Knowledge: Indicating that a person was aware of certain facts or conditions relevant to the current situation. For example, prior experience with a dangerous substance could show knowledge of its risks.
      • Identity: If past acts reveal a unique “signature” or modus operandi that links a person to the current event.
      • Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident: Particularly in cases where a defense claims an unintentional act.
    • 2017-11-21 Order – Minnesota Anoka County District Court Case Number 02-FA-17-1191 – Redacted.pdf
  10. Exhibit: 2018-02-20: February 20, 2018: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota Complaint by Dina Klein against Christopher Mundt of Mundt Law Group in Case Number 0:18-cv-00482-PAM-HB
  11. Exhibit: 2018-05-21 : May 21, 2018: Christopher Mundt Motion to Recuse and Transfer Venue – Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 17-0035-F425
  12. Exhibit: 2018-10-03: October 3, 2018: Email From James Evans Regarding Satan – Redacted
  13. Exhibit: 2018-11-07: November 07, 2018: 2018-11-07 Recording of the Child Being Abused by Christopher Jonathan Mundt in Pflugerville Texas
    • Relevance:
      • Mens rea: Mens rea is the “guilty mind” or mental state required for criminal liability, reflecting the defendant’s intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence when committing a crime.
      • Premeditation: The action of planning something (especially a crime) beforehand.
      • Motive: Explaining why an individual might have committed a particular act.
      • Opportunity: Indicating that a person had the means or access to commit the act in question. This focuses on the practical ability rather than a character trait.
      • Intent: Showing that an action was not accidental or mistaken. If a person repeatedly engages in similar fraudulent schemes, this pattern can demonstrate a deliberate intent in the current alleged fraud.
      • Preparation, Plan, and Premeditation: Where prior conduct reveals a larger scheme or a specific method leading up to the act.
      • Knowledge: Indicating that a person was aware of certain facts or conditions relevant to the current situation. For example, prior experience with a dangerous substance could show knowledge of its risks.
      • Identity: If past acts reveal a unique “signature” or modus operandi that links a person to the current event.
      • Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident: Particularly in cases where a defense claims an unintentional act.
    • 2018-11-07 Recording of A Child in Pflugerville Texas.mp4
      • Admissibility:
        • Texas Family Code Section 104.006:
          Sec. 104.006. HEARSAY STATEMENT OF CHILD ABUSE VICTIM.
          In a suit affecting the parent-child relationship, a statement made by a child 12 years of age or younger that describes alleged abuse against the child, without regard to whether the statement is otherwise inadmissible as hearsay, is admissible as evidence if, in a hearing conducted outside the presence of the jury, the court finds that the time, content, and circumstances of the statement provide sufficient indications of the statement’s reliability and:
          (1) the child testifies or is available to testify at the proceeding in court or in any other manner provided for by law; or
          (2) the court determines that the use of the statement in lieu of the child’s testimony is necessary to protect the welfare of the child.
          Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 575, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
  14. Exhibit: 2019-01-14: January 14, 2019: Letter to Christopher Mundt from Massachusetts Attorney
    • Written notice to Christopher Mundt that Donika Pentcheva intends to exercise parenting time in Massachusetts.
    • Relevance:
      • Mens rea: Mens rea is the “guilty mind” or mental state required for criminal liability, reflecting the defendant’s intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence when committing a crime.
      • Premeditation: The action of planning something (especially a crime) beforehand.
      • Motive: Explaining why an individual might have committed a particular act.
      • Opportunity: Indicating that a person had the means or access to commit the act in question. This focuses on the practical ability rather than a character trait.
      • Intent: Showing that an action was not accidental or mistaken. If a person repeatedly engages in similar fraudulent schemes, this pattern can demonstrate a deliberate intent in the current alleged fraud.
      • Preparation, Plan, and Premeditation: Where prior conduct reveals a larger scheme or a specific method leading up to the act.
      • Knowledge: Indicating that a person was aware of certain facts or conditions relevant to the current situation. For example, prior experience with a dangerous substance could show knowledge of its risks.
      • Identity: If past acts reveal a unique “signature” or modus operandi that links a person to the current event.
      • Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident: Particularly in cases where a defense claims an unintentional act.
    • 2019-01-14 Letter to Christopher Mundt from Massachusetts Attorney – Redacted.pdf
  15. Exhibit: 2019-01-22: January 22, 2019: Medford Massachusetts Police Report
    • Christopher Mundt threatens another attorney
    • Relevance:
      • Mens rea: Mens rea is the “guilty mind” or mental state required for criminal liability, reflecting the defendant’s intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence when committing a crime.
      • Premeditation: The action of planning something (especially a crime) beforehand.
      • Motive: Explaining why an individual might have committed a particular act.
      • Opportunity: Indicating that a person had the means or access to commit the act in question. This focuses on the practical ability rather than a character trait.
      • Intent: Showing that an action was not accidental or mistaken. If a person repeatedly engages in similar fraudulent schemes, this pattern can demonstrate a deliberate intent in the current alleged fraud.
      • Preparation, Plan, and Premeditation: Where prior conduct reveals a larger scheme or a specific method leading up to the act.
      • Knowledge: Indicating that a person was aware of certain facts or conditions relevant to the current situation. For example, prior experience with a dangerous substance could show knowledge of its risks.
      • Identity: If past acts reveal a unique “signature” or modus operandi that links a person to the current event.
      • Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident: Particularly in cases where a defense claims an unintentional act.
    • 2019-01-22 Medford Massachusetts Police Report (Christopher Mundt threatens another attorney).pdf
  16. Exhibit: 2020-03-08: March 8, 2020 CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES REPORT – Excerpt – Redacted
  17. Exhibit: 2020-10-07: October 7, 2020 Order on Petitioner’s Petition for Expunction of Records in Cause Number 17-0230-K26 – Redacted
  18. Exhibit: 2022-08-01: August 1, 2022 21-025-A425 Order
  19. Exhibit: 2023-11-29: November 29, 2023: Certified Signed Order of Expunction 23-1920-C395 DPP – Redacted
  20. Exhibit: 2023-11-30: November 30, 2023: Transmittal Email of Certified Order of Expunction 23-1920-C395 – Redacted
  21. Exhibit: 2023-12-15: December 15, 2023: Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 19-0051-PO425: Notice of Dismissal Mailed
  22. Exhibit: 2023-12-15: December 15, 2023: Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 19-0051-PO425: Order of Dismissal For Want of Prosecution
  23. Exhibit: 2024-10-01: October 1, 2024: Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure
  24. Exhibit: 2025-03-27: March 27, 2025: Email Correspondence From State of Texas, County of Williamson District Court Administrator
  25. Exhibit: 2025-10-27: October 27, 2025: 2025-10-27 Frank Penchev Request to Follow – Redacted
  26. Exhibit: 2025-10-28: October 28, 2025: Frank Penchev Request – Redacted
  27. Exhibit: 2025-10-28: October 28, 2025: 2025-10-28 Frank Penchev Request to Follow – Redacted
  28. Exhibit: 2025-12-03: December 3, 2025: Email From Texas Williamson County District Court Senior Administrator:
  29. Exhibit: 2025-12-08: December 8, 2025: Returned Mail – Christopher Jonathan Mundt and Daniela Georgieva Ivanova – Redacted
  30. Exhibit: 2025-12-12: December 12, 2025: Audio recording taken by Texas Process Server
    • Relevance:
      • Mens rea: Mens rea is the “guilty mind” or mental state required for criminal liability, reflecting the defendant’s intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence when committing a crime.
      • Premeditation: The action of planning something (especially a crime) beforehand.
      • Motive: Explaining why an individual might have committed a particular act.
      • Opportunity: Indicating that a person had the means or access to commit the act in question. This focuses on the practical ability rather than a character trait.
      • Intent: Showing that an action was not accidental or mistaken. If a person repeatedly engages in similar fraudulent schemes, this pattern can demonstrate a deliberate intent in the current alleged fraud.
      • Preparation, Plan, and Premeditation: Where prior conduct reveals a larger scheme or a specific method leading up to the act.
      • Knowledge: Indicating that a person was aware of certain facts or conditions relevant to the current situation. For example, prior experience with a dangerous substance could show knowledge of its risks.
      • Identity: If past acts reveal a unique “signature” or modus operandi that links a person to the current event.
      • Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident: Particularly in cases where a defense claims an unintentional act.
    • 2025-12-12 Recording (Voice 251212_162859).m4a
  31. Exhibit: 2025-12-13: December 13, 2025: Photograph of Jennifer Jenni Evans of Evans Family Law Group
  32. Exhibit: 2025-12-30: December 30, 2025: Texas Judicial Branch Certification Commission Complaint Filed By Christopher Mundt Against A Texas Process Server
    • Relevance:
      • Mens rea: Mens rea is the “guilty mind” or mental state required for criminal liability, reflecting the defendant’s intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence when committing a crime.
      • Premeditation: The action of planning something (especially a crime) beforehand.
      • Motive: Explaining why an individual might have committed a particular act.
      • Opportunity: Indicating that a person had the means or access to commit the act in question. This focuses on the practical ability rather than a character trait.
      • Intent: Showing that an action was not accidental or mistaken. If a person repeatedly engages in similar fraudulent schemes, this pattern can demonstrate a deliberate intent in the current alleged fraud.
      • Preparation, Plan, and Premeditation: Where prior conduct reveals a larger scheme or a specific method leading up to the act.
      • Knowledge: Indicating that a person was aware of certain facts or conditions relevant to the current situation. For example, prior experience with a dangerous substance could show knowledge of its risks.
      • Identity: If past acts reveal a unique “signature” or modus operandi that links a person to the current event.
      • Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident: Particularly in cases where a defense claims an unintentional act.
    • 2025-12-30 Judicial Branch Certification Commission Complaint Filed By Christopher Mundt – Redacted.pdf
  33. Exhibit: 2026-01-06: January 6, 2026: Certified Signed Order of Expunction 24-3098-C425 – Redacted
  34. Exhibit: 2026-01-07: January 7, 2026: Transmittal Email of Certified Order of Expunction 24-3098-C425 – Redacted
  35. Exhibit: 2026-01-16: January 16, 2026: Minnesota Appeals Court Case Number A25-1690
    • Relevance:
      • Mens rea: Mens rea is the “guilty mind” or mental state required for criminal liability, reflecting the defendant’s intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence when committing a crime.
      • Premeditation: The action of planning something (especially a crime) beforehand.
      • Motive: Explaining why an individual might have committed a particular act.
      • Opportunity: Indicating that a person had the means or access to commit the act in question. This focuses on the practical ability rather than a character trait.
      • Intent: Showing that an action was not accidental or mistaken. If a person repeatedly engages in similar fraudulent schemes, this pattern can demonstrate a deliberate intent in the current alleged fraud.
      • Preparation, Plan, and Premeditation: Where prior conduct reveals a larger scheme or a specific method leading up to the act.
      • Knowledge: Indicating that a person was aware of certain facts or conditions relevant to the current situation. For example, prior experience with a dangerous substance could show knowledge of its risks.
      • Identity: If past acts reveal a unique “signature” or modus operandi that links a person to the current event.
      • Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident: Particularly in cases where a defense claims an unintentional act.
    • 2026-01-16 Minnesota Appeals Court Case Number A25-1690 – Appellant Brief – DP v. Wells Fargo Bank.pdf
  36. Exhibit: 2026-01-12: January 12, 2026: Franklin P. Social Media Profile – Redacted
  37. Exhibit: 2026-02-25: February 25, 2026 Texas Third Court of Appeals – Judgment
  38. Exhibit: 2026-02-25: February 25, 2026 Texas Third Court of Appeals – Memorandum Opinion
  39. Exhibit: 2026-02-26: February 26, 2026 Notice of Nonsuit and Proposed Order 21-025-A425
  40. Exhibit: 2026-03-01: March 1, 2026: Texas Rules of Civil Procedure
  41. Exhibit: 2026-03-02: March 2, 2026 Texas Williamson County Sheriff’s Office Event Report
  42. Exhibit: 2026-03-03: March 3, 2026: Texas Williamson County Event Report
  43. Exhibit: 2026-03-11: March 11, 2026: Recording of Jennifer Jenni Evans of Evans Family Law Group to Texas Process Server Larry W. Rogers
    • Relevance:
      • Mens rea: Mens rea is the “guilty mind” or mental state required for criminal liability, reflecting the defendant’s intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence when committing a crime.
      • Premeditation: The action of planning something (especially a crime) beforehand.
      • Motive: Explaining why an individual might have committed a particular act.
      • Opportunity: Indicating that a person had the means or access to commit the act in question. This focuses on the practical ability rather than a character trait.
      • Intent: Showing that an action was not accidental or mistaken. If a person repeatedly engages in similar fraudulent schemes, this pattern can demonstrate a deliberate intent in the current alleged fraud.
      • Preparation, Plan, and Premeditation: Where prior conduct reveals a larger scheme or a specific method leading up to the act.
      • Knowledge: Indicating that a person was aware of certain facts or conditions relevant to the current situation. For example, prior experience with a dangerous substance could show knowledge of its risks.
      • Identity: If past acts reveal a unique “signature” or modus operandi that links a person to the current event.
      • Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident: Particularly in cases where a defense claims an unintentional act.
    • 2026-03-11 0906 AM CT Recording From Jenni Evans of Evans Family Law Group to Texas Process Server Larry W. Rogers.WMA
  44. Exhibit: 2026-03-12 : March 12, 2026: Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 26-0044-PO425 – Application by Christopher Mundt – Redacted
    • Relevance:
      • Mens rea: Mens rea is the “guilty mind” or mental state required for criminal liability, reflecting the defendant’s intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence when committing a crime.
      • Premeditation: The action of planning something (especially a crime) beforehand.
      • Motive: Explaining why an individual might have committed a particular act.
      • Opportunity: Indicating that a person had the means or access to commit the act in question. This focuses on the practical ability rather than a character trait.
      • Intent: Showing that an action was not accidental or mistaken. If a person repeatedly engages in similar fraudulent schemes, this pattern can demonstrate a deliberate intent in the current alleged fraud.
      • Preparation, Plan, and Premeditation: Where prior conduct reveals a larger scheme or a specific method leading up to the act.
      • Knowledge: Indicating that a person was aware of certain facts or conditions relevant to the current situation. For example, prior experience with a dangerous substance could show knowledge of its risks.
      • Identity: If past acts reveal a unique “signature” or modus operandi that links a person to the current event.
      • Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident: Particularly in cases where a defense claims an unintentional act.
    • 2026-03-12 Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 26-0044-PO425 – Application by Christopher Mundt – Redacted.pdf
  45. Exhibit: 2026-03-13: March 13, 2026: James Evans threatens to “kill”–James Evans’ own word–Donika Pentcheva
    • Relevance:
      • Mens rea: Mens rea is the “guilty mind” or mental state required for criminal liability, reflecting the defendant’s intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence when committing a crime.
      • Premeditation: The action of planning something (especially a crime) beforehand.
      • Motive: Explaining why an individual might have committed a particular act.
      • Opportunity: Indicating that a person had the means or access to commit the act in question. This focuses on the practical ability rather than a character trait.
      • Intent: Showing that an action was not accidental or mistaken. If a person repeatedly engages in similar fraudulent schemes, this pattern can demonstrate a deliberate intent in the current alleged fraud.
      • Preparation, Plan, and Premeditation: Where prior conduct reveals a larger scheme or a specific method leading up to the act.
      • Knowledge: Indicating that a person was aware of certain facts or conditions relevant to the current situation. For example, prior experience with a dangerous substance could show knowledge of its risks.
      • Identity: If past acts reveal a unique “signature” or modus operandi that links a person to the current event.
      • Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident: Particularly in cases where a defense claims an unintentional act.
    • 2026-03-13 James Evans threatens to kill Donika Pentcheva.pdf
  46. Exhibit: 2026-03-13: March 13, 2026: Texas “family attorney” James (“Jimmy”) W. Evans of Evans Family Law Group, PLLC threatens to “kill”–James Evans’ own word–Donika Pentcheva
    • Relevance:
      • Mens rea: Mens rea is the “guilty mind” or mental state required for criminal liability, reflecting the defendant’s intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence when committing a crime.
      • Premeditation: The action of planning something (especially a crime) beforehand.
      • Motive: Explaining why an individual might have committed a particular act.
      • Opportunity: Indicating that a person had the means or access to commit the act in question. This focuses on the practical ability rather than a character trait.
      • Intent: Showing that an action was not accidental or mistaken. If a person repeatedly engages in similar fraudulent schemes, this pattern can demonstrate a deliberate intent in the current alleged fraud.
      • Preparation, Plan, and Premeditation: Where prior conduct reveals a larger scheme or a specific method leading up to the act.
      • Knowledge: Indicating that a person was aware of certain facts or conditions relevant to the current situation. For example, prior experience with a dangerous substance could show knowledge of its risks.
      • Identity: If past acts reveal a unique “signature” or modus operandi that links a person to the current event.
      • Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident: Particularly in cases where a defense claims an unintentional act.
    • 2026-03-13 Recording of James (Jimmy) W. Evans at Evans Family Law Group, PLLC.m4v
  47. Exhibit: 2026-03-16: March 16, 2026: Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 26-0044-PO425 – Petition And Motion For The Guardianship of Christopher Jonathan Mundt
  48. Exhibit: 2026-03-18: March 18, 2026: Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 26-0044-PO425 – Donika Pentcheva’s Petition and Motion for Additional and Amended Counterclaims
  49. Exhibit: 2026-03-30: March 30, 2026 State of Texas, County of Williamson District Court Cause Number 21-025-A425 – Jury Request
  50. Exhibit: 2026-03-30: March 30, 2026: Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 26-0044-PO425 – Donika Pentcheva Request For A Jury Trial
  51. Exhibit: 2026-03-31: March 31, 2026: Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 26-0044-PO425 – Donika Pentcheva’s Request for A Jury Trial
  52. Exhibit: 2026-04-03: April 3, 2026: District of Columbia – Certificate of Good Standing
  53. Exhibit: 2026-04-06: April 6, 2026: Certificate From The Kentucky Bar Association
  54. Exhibit: 2026-04-07: April 7, 2026: Certification From The Office of The Clerk of The Supreme Court of Kentucky
  55. Exhibit: 2026-04-07: April 7, 2026: Certification From The Office of The Clerk of The Supreme Court of Kentucky
  56. Exhibit: 2026-04-08: April 8, 2026: United States Court of Appeals for The Federal Circuit – Disciplinary History Report – Donika Pentcheva
  57. Exhibit: 2026-04-08: April 8, 2026: Unted States Court of Appeals for The Federal Circuit -Certificate of Good Standing – Donika Pentcheva
  58. Exhibit: 2026-04-09: April 9, 2026: Correspondence From Minnesota Board of Law Examiners
  59. Exhibit: 2026-04-10: April 10, 2026: Correspondence From United States Supreme Court
  60. Exhibit: 2026-04-11: April 11, 2026: Correspondence From United States Patent and Trademark Office
  61. Exhibit: 2026-04-14: April 14, 2026: Email From District Court Administrator – address pending issues
  62. Exhibit: 2026-04-14: April 14, 2026: Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 26-0044-PO425: Motion
    • Christopher Jonathan Mundt, Daniela Georgieva Ivanova, James (“Jimmy”) W. Evans, and Evans Family Law Group, PLLC allege that court documents were “not personally handed to parties in this matter.” Page 1 of Motion filed on April 14, 2026 in Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 26-0044-PO425.
    • Christopher Jonathan Mundt, Daniela Georgieva Ivanova, James (“Jimmy”) W. Evans, and Evans Family Law Group, PLLC represent to the Texas Williamson County’s 425th District Court that Christopher Jonathan Mundt, Daniela Georgieva Ivanova, James (“Jimmy”) W. Evans, and Evans Family Law Group, PLLC have had “no contact with DONIKA PENTCHEVA in more than ten years”. Page 4 of Motion filed on April 14, 2026 in Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 26-0044-PO425.
    • 2026-04-14 Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 26-0044-PO425 – Motion (no contact in more than ten years) (page 4).pdf
  63. Exhibit: 2026-04-17: April 17, 2026: Email From Process Server: Declining the opportunity to serve legal documents upon CJM and opposing parties
  64. Exhibit: 2026-04-21 0954 AM CT: April 21, 2026 21-025-A425 Motion (Court-Stamped Copy)
  65. Exhibit: 2026-04-21 1025 AM CT: April 21, 2026 26-0044-PO425 Motion (Court-Stamped Copy)
  66. Exhibit: 2026-04-22: April 22, 2026: 21-025-A425 Affidavit of Due Diligence For Service Of Process Upon James (Jimmy) W Evans
  67. Exhibit: 2026-04-22: April 22, 2026: 26-0044-PO425 Affidavit of Due Diligence For Service Of Process Upon James (Jimmy) W Evans
  68. Exhibit: 2026-04-28: April 28, 2026 State of Texas, County of Williamson District Court Cause Number 21-025-A425 – Donika Pentcheva Court-Filed Documents
  69. Exhibit: 2026-04-28: April 28, 2026 State of Texas, County of Williamson District Court Cause Number 26-0044-PO425 – Donika Pentcheva Court-Filed Documents
  70. Exhibit: 2026-04-28: April 28, 2026: 21-025-A425 Affidavit of Due Diligence – Kate McKinsey
  71. Exhibit: 2026-04-28: April 28, 2026 26-0044-PO425 Affidavit of Due Diligence – Kate McKinsey
  72. Exhibit: 2026-04-29: April 29, 2026: 26-0044-PO425 Donika Pentcheva’s Motion to Dismiss The Opposing Parties’ Motion to Seal
  73. Exhibit: 2026-04-29: April 29, 2026: Order in State of Texas, County of Williamson District Court Cause Number 21-025-A425
  74. Exhibit: 2026-04-29: April 29, 2026: Order in Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 26-0044-PO425
  75. Exhibit: 2026-04-29: April 29, 2026: Order in Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 26-0044-PO425
  76. Exhibit: 2026-04-29: April 29, 2029: Affidavit in Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 26-0044-PO425
  77. Exhibit: 2026-04-30: April 30, 2026: Email To State of Texas Process Server
  78. Exhibit: 2026-04-30: April 30, 2026: Email To State of Texas Process Server
  79. Exhibit: 2026-04-30: April 30, 2026: Email To State of Texas Process Server
  80. Exhibit: 2026-04-30: April 30, 2026: Email To State of Texas Process Server
  81. Exhibit: 2026-04-30: April 30, 2026: Thank you, Question to Process Server
  82. Exhibit: 2026-04-30: April 30, 2026 Transcript Request to Official Court Reporter – Redacted
  83. Exhibit: 2026-04-30: April 30, 2026 Request for District Clerk’s Record for Purposes of An Appeal – Redacted
  84. Exhibit: 2026-05-03: May 3, 2026: State of Minnesota, County of Anoka Judicial Records Printout for Criminal Cases
  85. Exhibit: 2026-05-03: May 3, 2026: State of Texas, County of Travis Judicial Records Printout
  86. Exhibit: 2026-05-03: May 3, 2026: State of Texas, County of Williamson Judicial Records Printout for Criminal Cases
  87. Exhibit: 2026-05-04: May 4, 2026: Minnesota Judicial Branch Printout
  88. Exhibit: 2026-05-04: May 4, 2026: Williamson County District Clerk Website Instructions about sealed cases
  89. Exhibit: 2026-05-04: May 4, 2026: Rule 21a of Texas Rules of Civil Procedure
    • Rule 21a(a)(2) of Texas Rules of Civil Procedure:
      • “Documents Not Filed Electronically. A document not filed electronically may be served in person, by mail, by commercial delivery service, by fax, by email, or by such other manner as the court in its discretion may direct.”
    • 2026-05-04 Rule 21a of Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.pdf
  90. Exhibit: 2026-05-04: May 4, 2026: Christopher Mundt current employment according to ZoomInfo
  91. Exhibit: 2026-05-04: May 4, 2026: Email From Evans Family Law Group To District Court Administrator – Acknowledging Injunction To Filings By Parties
  92. Exhibit: 2026-05-04: May 4, 2026: Order Granting Attorneys Fees: State of Texas, County of Williamson District Court Case Number 26-0044-PO425
  93. Exhibit: 2026-05-05: May 5, 2026: Texas Attorney Complaint Information Brochure
  94. Exhibit: 2026-05-06: May 6, 2026: Jennifer Jenni Evans LinkedIn Profile
  95. Exhibit: 2026-05-06: May 6, 2026: Texas Williamson County District Court Case Number 19-0051-PO425 Judicial Records
  96. Exhibit: 2026-05-06: May 6, 2026: Texas Third Court of Appeals Case Number 03-25-00581-CV: Docket Summary
  97. Exhibit: 2026-05-06: May 6, 2026: 2026-05-06 Minnesota Hennepin County Case Number 27-CV-10-19784 – MI Bank v. Christopher J. Mundt – confirmation of bankruptcy of CJM
  98. Exhibit: 2026-05-06: May 6, 2026: Texas Williamson County District Court Records For Christopher Jonathan Mundt
  99. Exhibit: 2026-05-08: May 8, 2026: Travis County Texas Criminal Records Response – Redacted
  100. Exhibit: 2026-05-25: May 25, 2026 pinocchioclassactionlawsuit.com Printout
  101. Exhibit: 2026-05-25: May 25, 2026 State of Texas, County of Williamson Case Number 26-0044-PO425 – Register of Actions Summary
  102. Exhibit: 2026-05-25: May 25, 2026 Businesses Hurt by Christopher Jonathan Mundt
  103. Exhibit: 2026-06-03: June 3, 2026 Austin ISD could be next school district taken over by Texas
  104. Exhibit: 2026-06-05: June 5, 2026 Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct
  105. Exhibit: 2026-05-19: May 19, 2026 Executive Order – Restoring Integrity